"Thus saith the Lord my God; Feed the flock of the slaughter; Whose possessors slay them, and hold themselves not guilty: and they that sell them say, Blessed be the Lord; for I am rich: and their own shepherds pity them not".
Two days ago from this day of my writing this, two black males were murdered in cold blood. One was seen on live T.V. in Baton Rouge. As was the case with Eric Garner, this cold blooded murder was even more callous by the mere fact that this man was on the floor helpless, with the police kneeling on his chest, then proceeding to pull their firearms on his chest and proceeded to execute him.
Racist mass media claimed he was scuffling with the police. Such blatant lying by the white press against all blacks lie at the heart of this great racial divide. In the video the man offered no resistance to the police, but he was manhandled, thrown to the ground, their knees on his chest and then shot twice execution style. [I heard it was six shots]. This is a case of first degree murder. If these murderous cops walk free, then this white run world needs to be burnt to the ground.
Eric Garners murderer/s have yet to be prosecuted. A black supervisor on the scene after the fact is being scapegoated for Mr Garner's death, while his actual killer Daniel Pantaleo is still walking around free. Where is the justice for blacks? Mike Brown, murdered in Ferguson, and his body left out in the open with blatant racial remarks by the then police chief, and open disrespect of all blacks by racists cops led to days of rioting. His killer received a large sum of monies from a fund set up by the red-necked governor of the state, and has subsequently left his job and is also walking around Scott free.
The very next day, a black man shoots and kills 5 police officers in Dallas, while wounding another 7 along with some civilians. With the mass media's outcry and the so-called public support for the gangsters called the "Fraternal Order of Police" of which has too many klansmen and bigoted whites in it's ranks to really serve the interests of justice, I had to take another two days to cool off lest I write something to make me get shot or arrested immediately.
Serpentine Hillary Clinton made some comments on the racial divide and injustice being perpetrated against blacks in this society. So too did Donald Trump. The Negroes proudest achievement however, {A Black President?} while deploring the killings of those 5 police men in Dallas, failed to address the cause of the killings which was and is the continual wanton murdering of black males and females by a justice system ran by white racists and uncle tom house Negroes, and oblivious to the crimes done by so-called law enforcement against blacks.
As I have said before and will say time and time again, history will condemn Barack Obama for being a spineless president who did nothing to encourage the rooting out of klansmen within the ranks of the Justice system.
Just a day earlier, the Obama administration had laid sanctions against North Korea for abuses done to the North Korean People. Now the whole world is seeing white America's hypocrisy, as the abuses done to blacks are being streamlined to the world, from Eric Garner in New York, to Tamir Rice in Ohio, to the black man In North Carolina, to Wisconsin, to Mike Brown in Ferguson, and now Baton Rouge to Minnesota.
Like the Emperor nakedly and proudly proclaiming look at my new clothes, this Oreo cookie President was caught out there in a foreign country decrying violence against the police while he has steadfastly refused to address the blatant racism in all police departments across the continental United States, that murder blacks willy nilly and go free without getting prosecuted.
The hypocrisy of white America is plain for all to see. Are not the mothers and sisters and aunts of the long list of blacks murdered at the hands of the police, are their tears and pain any less than whites? When Eric Garner and Mike Brown were killed, mass media screamed headlines about some white journalist getting beheaded by Isis, as if the murders of Eric Garner and Mike Brown were insignificant.
Timothy McVeigh, killed 168 people and wounded 600 more, and yet as a white terrorist he was captured alive, do you really want to tell us blacks that you had no choice but to blast the hero Micah Johnson to bits? Yes I said Hero. Mr Johnson has done what many a black man has had on his mind to do but not the nerve to execute.
Until whites who are cops reject their white race mongering brethren from among their ranks, they are all complicit in the murder and continual harassment of blacks, and sadly those who seem innocent will always pay the price. Perhaps now they will know how it feels for a black male who runs into them and is automatically a suspect just because some racist cop wants it to be so. So now we all look at them as potential killers of our sons and daughters.
While the hypocritical wailing by racist politico's and house Negroes set to serve whitey's agenda weep for the cops in Dallas, let us now ask the question; Since the passing and subsequent repealing of Jim Crow laws, how many white policemen have been prosecuted for openly murdering black men? None. The list of white men who have killed blacks while masquerading as officers of the law is astounding and Daniel Pantaleo and Darren Dean Wilson, killers of Eric Garner and Mike Brown, are now being joined by the killers of Freddie Gray and Chinese Peter Liang, who protesting his probationary sentence as unjust, must think he also has the right to kill Negroes willy nilly. Hell, if whitey can do it so why shouldn't he?, That must be his thought process.
"Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God, For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head. They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. They have said, come, let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance. for they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate* against thee: The tabernacles of Edom, (whitey) and the Ishmaelites (Arabs); of Moab (I still say they are the Chinese), and the Hagarenes {Egyptians}.
Racist slime Rudolph Giuliani, is now seen on T.V. saying that Black lives is an anti American movement. In other words if you are for the respect of blacks and our lives then something is wrong with you. Hmm, as you can see something is very wrong with demons like him. Mr Giuliani during his tenure, sanctioned the death of a black male by trivializing the man's existence by saying this squeegee man had a crack pipe in his possession and had a criminal history, so it was alright to kill him.
Giuliani was also responsible for leading a horde of racist P.B.A. members to Gracie Mansion when the then Mayor was David Dinkins, and had them calling the man names of which the infamous "N" word was used abundantly by these red-necked racist walking around with badges as it were a license to kill.
Whites, while professing Christianity, have a long history of bombing black houses of worship. Just recently a young white male entered a black church and killed 9 black persons in the church. He was arrested and treated with kid gloves. Likewise was the killer of the abortion clinic, treated with kid gloves upon his arrest.
In one of the most racist northern states, second only to Boston, Massachusetts, yes I am speaking of New York, and if you didn't know,? Now you know. In the city of Buffalo, state of New York, a black former police officer Cariol Horne, was beaten severely by her white partner when she attempted to intervene or stop her white partner from choking a person already in handcuffs being led to their vehicle.
Her partner, one white male named Gregory Kwiatkowski, turned on her and beat her viciously, breaking her jaw and fracturing her face so that she's had to have reconstructive surgery out of her own pockets, since the Buffalo P.D. saw it fit to terminate her employment for attempting to do the right thing. Where is the justice that is due to this upright former police woman?? Meanwhile racist Gregory kwiatkowski is still employed and on the job just waiting to kill or maim some hapless unsuspecting black. She should sue the entire police department and city.
When the Justice department comes in like gangbusters and clean up wrong doings in police departments like these all across the country, then the police will not have to worry that blacks will be on a rampage against them. Unlikely though, since the racists within the police departments are hell bent on stirring a racial war.
The list of wrongs inflicted upon blacks by the police could fill all the books in four or five branches of any public library. More and more police men will be complicit in criminal endeavors by them ignoring what their racially motivated brethren are attempting to do to blacks while on their watch. That said, more and more officers will bite the bullet if a swift overhaul of the biased is not done within the ranks of law enforcement.
This also includes the removal of many judges who are staunch racists and are still in office. The Black Panther Party. The name alone sends shivers down the spine of many whites. No I will shed no tear or utter a word of grief for those cops in Dallas. Where was the outrage when white cops all across America did 'legal' drive by shootings of Black Panther offices which often ended up in the deaths of many heroic black men and women?
All the Black Panthers did was to institute a food program for our elderly, tried to establish better medical treatment for those of us in our community and attempt to get better education for our young, and the reward was that they were gunned down for trying to help their people. Address those wrongs in your speeches you two bit steppin fetchit prez.
White racism is coming out the pores of these mass media types, as if blacks have gotten all the fair treatment they will ever receive from whitey in this or any other lifetime. Here comes whitey proclaiming how Dallas is far advanced in it's treatment of Negroes, amid claims that they have the lowest ratio of 'nigger killings', compared to other cities nationally.
But wait a minute, Dallas is in the state of Texas, isn't it.? Let's see, Sandra Bland was found dead in her jail cell somewhere in Texas. So too was a recently returned vet SSG James Brown found killed in his cell in El paso Texas. In the video concerning him he was seen surrounded by six to seven white men, one of whom had a needle with unknown fluid which was probably the leading cause of that man's death. The justice department has yet to even make a statement or attempt to investigate these crimes, which have all lead to the conclusion by many of us blacks that there is indeed no justice for us at the hands of the white justice system of America.
And the President is still in denial telling the world that America is not divided. All the world can see that it is, divided into black and white. If you are as racists as Rudy Giuliani, then you are against us, and we have no love lost on you, for as surely as there is a higher power that has stated that whites must pay for the crimes of enslaving the Negro, so too many of us would like to have Giuliani on our property slaving his damned bald pate off. Think its unlikely?
"And kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers: they shall bow down to thee with their face toward the earth, and lick up the dust of thy feet; and thou shalt know that I am the Lord [Yah]: for they shall not be ashamed that wait for me" Isaiah chapter 49 vs 23, [K.J.V. 1611]. It is coming.! And so my friends until next time, live well, be happy, make love, we bid you peace.
Monday, July 11, 2016
Thursday, July 7, 2016
The Lies versus The Truth of The Bible and John 3;16.
"Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth" 2 Timothy 2:15 [K.J.V.]
One of the most prolific tales of the Bible, is that The Most High, is about one emotion only, and that emotion is love, and love alone. That is as far from the truth as the farthest region of the east is from the farthest region of the west.
The major lie told, (And yet it is of a truth true, but for whom?) to all so-called 'Christians' from before the day I was born until this very day is this scripture in John chapter 3 vs 16. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever should believe in him should not perish, but have everlasting life".
The first thing to do here is to understand the "World" of which this is speaking of. Why? Because elsewhere in the same New Testament we are admonished in 1 John 2:15 "Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the father is not in him".
So, if our father so loved the world, is it not like the children to do as dad does and love what he loves? (the world?)? Understanding however makes us to understand that there is several different meanings to this word 'world' and it's meaning.
Before I delve into the Websters meaning of the word 'World', let us examine the 'American Heritage's dictionary of the English language'. "WORLD". (1) Earth, (2) The Universe, (3) the Earth with it's inhabitants, (4) inhabitants of the earth; human race. (5a) human kind considered as social beings, human society, (5b) people as a whole, the public. (6) often World, *a specified part of the Earth*: the Western world. (Note*= this is most integral to understanding John 3:16.) [As for the Western world, hmm, how about the world of Israel???] (7) *a part of the earth and it's inhabitants as known at a given period in history: the ancient world.*
(8) a realm or domain, the animal world, the world of the imagination, (9a) a sphere of human activity or interest: the world of sports, (b) class or group of people with common characteristics or pursuits: the scientific world. (10) a particular way of life: world of the homeless. 12, 13,a,b, 14 and 15, I omitted as they served no purpose in my thesis/treatise.
As with # 6 and 7, the true meaning of the world that The Most High loved is the 'world of Israel', and none other. What many have so often overlooked also is the nature of Yah and his preference to men of war.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight". Psalms 144 vs 1. [K.J.V.] All throughout the scriptures there has been more than enough references to war, wars and conflicts, not only between kings and kingdoms but also friends and families. "He teacheth my hands to war, so that a bow of steel is broken by mine arms". Does this sound like a "GOD" is all and only love type persona? I don't think so, and for my bamboozled fellow Negroes, neither should you.
"Let the saints (the Negroes) be joyful in glory: let them sing aloud upon their beds. Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a two edged sword in their hand; To execute vengeance upon the heathen, [other nations], and punishments upon the people; to bind their kings with chains, and their nobles with fetters of iron; To execute upon them the judgment written: this honor have all his saints". Psalms 149 vs 5-9.[K.J.V.]
So far as can be seen, Yah, The Most High, or whatever other name he gave you to call him, is not only about love. Imagine if you will, that you, one of millions of people inhabiting this planet, has likes and dislikes. In your preferences concerning foods, clothing and people, there are some folks you like automatically, and some you just do not take a liking to. Who can tell your taste buds what to like and what not to like, except you? Do you automatically like every bit of clothing handed to you, or every piece you ever bought? So why do you think that if the Creator who made you to have different feelings should be limited to only one? And that be love?
"I am the Lord, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:" The problem with many of us Negroes is the fact that despite Yah using other nations and the white man to whip our behinds we still refuse to acknowledge The Most High. "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace and create evil: I the Lord do all these things". Isaiah chap 45 vs 5 and 7. [K.J.V.1611]
It is very evident that the white owned and ran seminaries that produce these black uncle tom house Negro type preachers have not seriously read or studied this book called the bible, and have been programmed to spread John 3:16 as blind gospel truth to the Negroes in every corner of America and the Caribbean Islands.
Seriously though, the word 'world' does not only mean the entire planet, it can be subdivided to be inclusive of a particular people or society. Thus the blind check of inclusion by all the rest of the nations on earth into the exclusive society of the Negro has ran rampant for far too long, with the Negroes thinking of themselves as strangers to the commonwealth of their inheritance, being the true biological and biblical sons and daughters of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the true children of Israel.
Websters New Universal Dictionary of the English language Unabridged 2nd Edition of 1970 states: WORLD (1)the Earth, (2) the Universe, (3) the Earth and it's inhabitants, (4a) some portion or division of the Earth: as the old world, the new world, (b) any state or sphere of existence: any wide scene of life or action: as the world to come, (c) some period of history; it's society etc,as, the ancient world, (d) any sphere or domain; as, the dog world, the animal, vegetable or mineral world, {How about the world of Israel?} (e) any sphere of human activity; as, the world of music.
"For 'God' so loved the world" must now be seen in a different light, not as all inclusive of every living being but as the exclusive world of Israel. In the 2007 Merriam Webster edition, WORLD 1) earth, 2) people in general: humanity, 3) a state of existence, 4) a great number or amount, 5) a part or section of the earth and the people living there!
#5 a part or section of the earth and the people living there, relates to the Negroes living in Jerusalem (Ariel) and the surrounding regions including Samaria during the time of the Messiah, and these are the people that John the apostle/disciple described as having the love of Yah so much so that he sent Yahawahshai to deliver us from our path of self destruction.
YAHAWAH ah-yash ma-la-chaamah, YAHAWAH sham-wa. = The Lord (Yah) is a man of war, YAHAWAH is his name. Exodus chapter 15 vs 3. Both in the Thaw-Rah (Torah) and the K.J.V.1611. War is coming and with it shall come a beautiful new day for the Negroes, and eternal darkness for the children of Edom, who is Esau, who is whitey, or better known as the red devil, or red-necks.
From the book of Genesis to the book of Revelation, this compilation of books called the Bible has been and is only about the nation of Israel. Genesis chapter 15 vs 13-14 "And he said unto Abram, know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; And also that nation whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance". This was a future prophesy of Israel before we even became a nation in ancient Egypt.
"And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be greivous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called". Genesis chap 21 vs 12. [K.J.V.] Here we see Yah establishing the link from Abraham to Isaac.
Genesis chapter 25 vs 23 "And the Lord said unto her, (Rebekah, Isaac's wife), Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger". Vs 25, "And the first came out red, all over like a hairy garment; and they called his name Esau".
Esau is from the Hebrew word I-sha, which means to do. at his birth his father decided he needed more time in the oven to get some color, thus the name I-sha-wa, 'wa' at the end meant he and since I-sha meant 'to do', it meant he Esau needed to get done. The later 'a' of the 'wa' is removed making it 'I-shaw' translated as Esau!
"And God came to Laban the Syrian in a dream by night, and said unto him, Take heed that thou speak not to Jacob either good or bad". Gen 31 vs 24. [K.J.V.]
In Genesis chapter 32, we read of Jacob getting his name changed by an angel -messenger of Yah, from Jacob to Israel, thus we see the link from Abraham to Isaac to Jacob, who is Israel by his twelve sons. Vs 28"And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel, (Ya-Shar Ah-La): for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed".
Revelation chapter 21 vs 2, "And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband". Again in Revelation chapter 7 vs 2-4;"And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea, Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads. And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel".
There you have it, this book is strictly the business of Israel. Space and time precludes getting into explaining parts of Revelation, of what I do know from what I do not know. Certainly there are some learned men who will disagree with our interpretation of the beasts with seven heads and ten horns as being the major white ran gov't's which ran the earth at some point or other in time.
But ask yourself this question, is not the white man running this planet and all of us on it currently? And has not the scripture stated this? "The earth is given into the hand of the wicked: he covereth the faces of the judges thereof; if not, where, and who is he?". Job 9:24. [K.J.V.1611].
For a minute I want to say to some of my erstwhile and studious brothers, please forget that sticking to some Askenazi rational as to who this beast is, it is just not the children of Amalek combined with Ashkenazi's alone. "And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth". Mountains are mostly representative of governments in the scriptures. Revelation chapter 17 vs 9.
In verse 11 it states "And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition". This eighth beast is America, beleive it or not. Did not America get formed from a breakaway alliance from the British, who is the seventh beast? And years later they both have formed alliances from the days of the first world's war to the second world's war, to this very day.
The Bible is all about the Negro regaining favor with Yah and regaining the earth's rightful ruler-ship as originally mandated by Yah. "Thus saith the Lord, your redeemer, the Holy One of Israel: For your sake I have sent to Babylon, and have brought down all their nobles, and the Chaldeans, whose cry is in the ships. I am the Lord, your Holy One, the creator of Israel, your King". Isaiah chapter 43 vs 14-15. [K.J.V.]
Again in Amos chapter 3 vs 1-2,"Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, You only have I known of all the families of the earth: Therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities".
Last but not least James 1 vs 1. "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, (Yahawahshai), to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting". Any where and everywhere in this book it is all about Israel. And just who are the Israelites? They are the Negroes residing in North America and South America and the Caribbean Islands. along with our seemingly so-called native Indian brethren. And so until next time, live well, be happy, make love, we bid you Peace.
One of the most prolific tales of the Bible, is that The Most High, is about one emotion only, and that emotion is love, and love alone. That is as far from the truth as the farthest region of the east is from the farthest region of the west.
The major lie told, (And yet it is of a truth true, but for whom?) to all so-called 'Christians' from before the day I was born until this very day is this scripture in John chapter 3 vs 16. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever should believe in him should not perish, but have everlasting life".
The first thing to do here is to understand the "World" of which this is speaking of. Why? Because elsewhere in the same New Testament we are admonished in 1 John 2:15 "Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the father is not in him".
So, if our father so loved the world, is it not like the children to do as dad does and love what he loves? (the world?)? Understanding however makes us to understand that there is several different meanings to this word 'world' and it's meaning.
Before I delve into the Websters meaning of the word 'World', let us examine the 'American Heritage's dictionary of the English language'. "WORLD". (1) Earth, (2) The Universe, (3) the Earth with it's inhabitants, (4) inhabitants of the earth; human race. (5a) human kind considered as social beings, human society, (5b) people as a whole, the public. (6) often World, *a specified part of the Earth*: the Western world. (Note*= this is most integral to understanding John 3:16.) [As for the Western world, hmm, how about the world of Israel???] (7) *a part of the earth and it's inhabitants as known at a given period in history: the ancient world.*
(8) a realm or domain, the animal world, the world of the imagination, (9a) a sphere of human activity or interest: the world of sports, (b) class or group of people with common characteristics or pursuits: the scientific world. (10) a particular way of life: world of the homeless. 12, 13,a,b, 14 and 15, I omitted as they served no purpose in my thesis/treatise.
As with # 6 and 7, the true meaning of the world that The Most High loved is the 'world of Israel', and none other. What many have so often overlooked also is the nature of Yah and his preference to men of war.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight". Psalms 144 vs 1. [K.J.V.] All throughout the scriptures there has been more than enough references to war, wars and conflicts, not only between kings and kingdoms but also friends and families. "He teacheth my hands to war, so that a bow of steel is broken by mine arms". Does this sound like a "GOD" is all and only love type persona? I don't think so, and for my bamboozled fellow Negroes, neither should you.
"Let the saints (the Negroes) be joyful in glory: let them sing aloud upon their beds. Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a two edged sword in their hand; To execute vengeance upon the heathen, [other nations], and punishments upon the people; to bind their kings with chains, and their nobles with fetters of iron; To execute upon them the judgment written: this honor have all his saints". Psalms 149 vs 5-9.[K.J.V.]
So far as can be seen, Yah, The Most High, or whatever other name he gave you to call him, is not only about love. Imagine if you will, that you, one of millions of people inhabiting this planet, has likes and dislikes. In your preferences concerning foods, clothing and people, there are some folks you like automatically, and some you just do not take a liking to. Who can tell your taste buds what to like and what not to like, except you? Do you automatically like every bit of clothing handed to you, or every piece you ever bought? So why do you think that if the Creator who made you to have different feelings should be limited to only one? And that be love?
"I am the Lord, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:" The problem with many of us Negroes is the fact that despite Yah using other nations and the white man to whip our behinds we still refuse to acknowledge The Most High. "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace and create evil: I the Lord do all these things". Isaiah chap 45 vs 5 and 7. [K.J.V.1611]
It is very evident that the white owned and ran seminaries that produce these black uncle tom house Negro type preachers have not seriously read or studied this book called the bible, and have been programmed to spread John 3:16 as blind gospel truth to the Negroes in every corner of America and the Caribbean Islands.
Seriously though, the word 'world' does not only mean the entire planet, it can be subdivided to be inclusive of a particular people or society. Thus the blind check of inclusion by all the rest of the nations on earth into the exclusive society of the Negro has ran rampant for far too long, with the Negroes thinking of themselves as strangers to the commonwealth of their inheritance, being the true biological and biblical sons and daughters of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the true children of Israel.
Websters New Universal Dictionary of the English language Unabridged 2nd Edition of 1970 states: WORLD (1)the Earth, (2) the Universe, (3) the Earth and it's inhabitants, (4a) some portion or division of the Earth: as the old world, the new world, (b) any state or sphere of existence: any wide scene of life or action: as the world to come, (c) some period of history; it's society etc,as, the ancient world, (d) any sphere or domain; as, the dog world, the animal, vegetable or mineral world, {How about the world of Israel?} (e) any sphere of human activity; as, the world of music.
"For 'God' so loved the world" must now be seen in a different light, not as all inclusive of every living being but as the exclusive world of Israel. In the 2007 Merriam Webster edition, WORLD 1) earth, 2) people in general: humanity, 3) a state of existence, 4) a great number or amount, 5) a part or section of the earth and the people living there!
#5 a part or section of the earth and the people living there, relates to the Negroes living in Jerusalem (Ariel) and the surrounding regions including Samaria during the time of the Messiah, and these are the people that John the apostle/disciple described as having the love of Yah so much so that he sent Yahawahshai to deliver us from our path of self destruction.
YAHAWAH ah-yash ma-la-chaamah, YAHAWAH sham-wa. = The Lord (Yah) is a man of war, YAHAWAH is his name. Exodus chapter 15 vs 3. Both in the Thaw-Rah (Torah) and the K.J.V.1611. War is coming and with it shall come a beautiful new day for the Negroes, and eternal darkness for the children of Edom, who is Esau, who is whitey, or better known as the red devil, or red-necks.
From the book of Genesis to the book of Revelation, this compilation of books called the Bible has been and is only about the nation of Israel. Genesis chapter 15 vs 13-14 "And he said unto Abram, know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; And also that nation whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance". This was a future prophesy of Israel before we even became a nation in ancient Egypt.
"And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be greivous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called". Genesis chap 21 vs 12. [K.J.V.] Here we see Yah establishing the link from Abraham to Isaac.
Genesis chapter 25 vs 23 "And the Lord said unto her, (Rebekah, Isaac's wife), Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger". Vs 25, "And the first came out red, all over like a hairy garment; and they called his name Esau".
Esau is from the Hebrew word I-sha, which means to do. at his birth his father decided he needed more time in the oven to get some color, thus the name I-sha-wa, 'wa' at the end meant he and since I-sha meant 'to do', it meant he Esau needed to get done. The later 'a' of the 'wa' is removed making it 'I-shaw' translated as Esau!
"And God came to Laban the Syrian in a dream by night, and said unto him, Take heed that thou speak not to Jacob either good or bad". Gen 31 vs 24. [K.J.V.]
In Genesis chapter 32, we read of Jacob getting his name changed by an angel -messenger of Yah, from Jacob to Israel, thus we see the link from Abraham to Isaac to Jacob, who is Israel by his twelve sons. Vs 28"And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel, (Ya-Shar Ah-La): for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed".
Revelation chapter 21 vs 2, "And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband". Again in Revelation chapter 7 vs 2-4;"And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea, Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads. And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel".
There you have it, this book is strictly the business of Israel. Space and time precludes getting into explaining parts of Revelation, of what I do know from what I do not know. Certainly there are some learned men who will disagree with our interpretation of the beasts with seven heads and ten horns as being the major white ran gov't's which ran the earth at some point or other in time.
But ask yourself this question, is not the white man running this planet and all of us on it currently? And has not the scripture stated this? "The earth is given into the hand of the wicked: he covereth the faces of the judges thereof; if not, where, and who is he?". Job 9:24. [K.J.V.1611].
For a minute I want to say to some of my erstwhile and studious brothers, please forget that sticking to some Askenazi rational as to who this beast is, it is just not the children of Amalek combined with Ashkenazi's alone. "And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth". Mountains are mostly representative of governments in the scriptures. Revelation chapter 17 vs 9.
In verse 11 it states "And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition". This eighth beast is America, beleive it or not. Did not America get formed from a breakaway alliance from the British, who is the seventh beast? And years later they both have formed alliances from the days of the first world's war to the second world's war, to this very day.
The Bible is all about the Negro regaining favor with Yah and regaining the earth's rightful ruler-ship as originally mandated by Yah. "Thus saith the Lord, your redeemer, the Holy One of Israel: For your sake I have sent to Babylon, and have brought down all their nobles, and the Chaldeans, whose cry is in the ships. I am the Lord, your Holy One, the creator of Israel, your King". Isaiah chapter 43 vs 14-15. [K.J.V.]
Again in Amos chapter 3 vs 1-2,"Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, You only have I known of all the families of the earth: Therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities".
Last but not least James 1 vs 1. "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, (Yahawahshai), to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting". Any where and everywhere in this book it is all about Israel. And just who are the Israelites? They are the Negroes residing in North America and South America and the Caribbean Islands. along with our seemingly so-called native Indian brethren. And so until next time, live well, be happy, make love, we bid you Peace.
Friday, July 1, 2016
More Questions? Hmm
The story of Joseph. In Genesis chap 37 of the Bible, the subheading on the page states, The history of Joseph. So, what exactly is the question? In verse 27 of the said chapter, Judah is purported as offering Joseph for sale to the Ishmeelites. In verse 28 it is said that Joseph was sold to the Ishmeelites for twenty pieces of silver who were passing by as 'Midianites' merchantmen.
Vs 36 states that the 'Midianites' sold Joseph to Potiphar. Now here is where I seem to get baffled. Ishmael, was Abrahams first son, albeit not the chosen, as he was the son of Hagar the Egyptian. This also leads to the question as to why Isaac was called the only son, and why Abraham was willing to sacrifice Isaac, since he knew that Ishmael was his son also.
Midian, father to the Midianites, was one of Abrahams sons with Keturah after the passing/death of Sarah. So the question I am really asking is, just who did have and sold Joseph? Was it the Midianites or the Ishmeelites? Ishmeelites here I take it is a misspelling of Ishmael, father of the Ishmaelites.
Perhaps one of my learned brethren can clear my ignorance on this matter, as trivial as it may seem to some.
King David, said to be a man after the heart of The Most High, 1Samuel chapter 13 vs 14. Question? In chapter 17 in the first book of kings, called 1Samuel, starting in verse 34 we read,
"And David said unto Saul, thy servant kept his fathers sheep, and there came a lion, and a bear, and took a lamb out of the flock": Now to my knowledge of animals, bears and lions don't run together, something just does not sound right, and no one questions this because they are either too enarmored with the story of bravery, or are just willing to acccept little 'white lies'.
Vs 35-36 "And I went out after him and smote him, and delivered it out of his mouth: and when he arose against me, I caught him by his beard, and smote him, and slew him. Thy servant slew both the lion and the bear: and this uncircumcised Philistine shall be as one of them, seeing he hath defied the armies of the living God.
So again the question here is, was it one animal or two that he slayed at the same time? Because in verse 37 it is ascribed to David as saying, "David said moreover, The Lord that delivered me out of the paw of the lion, and out of the paw of the bear, he will deliver me out of the hand of this Philistine".
I have always been struck by this note, as to how he could have killed a bear and a lion over just one lamb, since no lion is about to share his prey with a bear, how could this be that he slew these two ferocious animals at once? Something here also does not sound right. Either he killed a lion, or he killed a bear, but this two-fer doesn't make it past me, if you accept that, that's on you, I'm just saying.
Now concerning poverty, wealth and other social issues. Many think or believe that for any one to believe or accept the Messiah, Yahawahshai Son of The Most High, that one ought to be dirt poor, living in abject poverty to be righteous.
Then there are the money hungry money changers parading as pastors, reverends and ministers all making disproportionate monies from allegedly preaching the word of 'God' to congregations bamboozled and hoodwinked into fear of a white Jesus placing them into eternal hell-fires.
While many of these preachers preach about the paying of tithes from the 'Old Testament', they are also quick to say that it's (the Old Testament) done away with and come with some Grecian ideas of pagan corruption of the laws given to Israel, and since the Messiah came and went, ergo the New Testament.
Is poverty a requirement to righteousness though? Deuteronomy 15 vs 11 "For the poor shall never cease out of the land: therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land".
This is a statement letting us know that there will always be poverty, not that it is a requirement for salvation or righteousness, and that we Israelites should practice love and kindness one toward another. The meaness of human nature and of us towards each other is one of the great faults that has brought us down from favor with Yah.
Another great bamboozling tool of so-called 'Christianity' and their self serving preachers is the use of 1Timothy chap 6 verses 9-10. "But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition". This is taken as an admonition to remain in poverty and not to seek gain in any form, which is contradictory to nature and life in any form, as life itself is about movement, both physically, spiritually, mentally and reflects in one's lifestyle or living, or the lack thereof.
Vs 10 "For the love* of money is the root of all evil: (*Note; it is the love* of, not the actual unfeeling money itself that's the root of evil, or should it not have said plain old greed?) which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows". Most folks jump on these two verses and just blindly think and accept poverty as the right way to be, and in most instances, this fits the so-called Negro to a Tee.
Indeed the scriptures do point out that greed is the very sin/ error of man that is leading down the path to self destruction. "He that loveth silver shall not be satisfied with silver; nor he that loveth abundance with increase: this is also vanity" Ecclesiastes 5 vs 10.[K.J.V.]. So, is it wrong to want abundance?
"The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly". John 10 vs 10. What therefore is this abundance that our Messiah is speaking of? Surely this abundance could not mean more poverty? "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan". Revelation chap 2 vs 9. [K.J.V.]
If even in our state of poverty we are rich, then to be rich is certainly not a crime, though many would have you to believe so. Of course there are levels to this, from the physical to the spiritual.
Money can not only be used for evil, it is also used for good, often times not recognized as such. "For wisdom is a defence, and money is a defence: but the excellency of knowledge is, that wisdom giveth life to them that have it" Ecclesiastes 7 vs 12. Here it states that money is a defence. You must have also heard the old saying that a fool and his money is soon parted.
As for those who justify the Care for a Dollar preachers and the T.D.Jake types this is what is said of them, who are supposed to feed the flock of Yah, "Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter". Isaiah chap 56: 11.
Of course this entire book of the Bible is indeed a mystery to many and many parts have not been revealed to some or to all. "And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, (indeed many facts were sealed and are just now being revealed by the Holy spirit through those Yah has appointed to bring many things to light), which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot for it is sealed":
Those stepinfetchit white theologians churned out to promote John 3:16 into the hearts and minds/homes of the Negro still cannot give any understanding of what indeed this book is putting forth for the true people of Yah. And so many of the prophesies both past , present and future remain sealed from their understanding.
"And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, [The average man on the street], saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned". Isaiah chap 30 vs 11-12. [K.J.V.].
The average man and woman on the streeet only go by what most of these lying preachers put forth to them as gospel truth without following the admonition given in the book of or should I say letter to Timothy, to "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth". And thus it seems why so many have left off using the brain that Yah gave them to question or to think as to what is written and to use their imagination as to the time period written and as to human nature in all that is written.
"The Lord shall command the blessing upon thee in thy storehouses, and in all that thou settest thine hand unto; and he shall bless thee in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee". The purpose of tithes was two fold back then. One it was to ensure that the levites would always have sufficient for their needs, and secondly to assist the poor of our nation as a collective.
"Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be meat in mine house, and prove me now herewith, saith the Lord of hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it". Malachi chap 3 vs 10.
That is the purpose of tithes, it is supposed to be a sort of savings fund to be used for the good of those of our brethren and sisters in dire need of assistance, not to fluff the pockets of these T.D.Jakes types, or Joel Osteen, Stanley, or any of the innumerable T.V. preachers around giving their spiels on the word of Yah.
Also there is nothing wrong with substance as can be seen by the example of our forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. All three men had great substance and were blessed in their possessions by Yah. "House and riches are the inheritance of fathers: and a prudent wife is from the Lord" Proverbs chap 19 vs 14.. As we see here there is nothing wrong with riches, although many presume that it's wrong to have.
Now we all know of the young man that was rich that did not want to be separate from his riches when he wanted to walk with the Messiah when he came to ancient Jerusalem. Many have since thought that it would be impossible to have and still be in good grace with Yah, ignoring the word of Yahawahshai that with Yah all things are possible.
Again here is the real deal, since Yah is My father is not this whole earth his? Psalms 50 vs 10-12, "For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine. If I were hungry I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof".
Since this planet belongs to my father Yah, where does it say that I should dwell in constant poverty, seeing that all belongs to abba Yah? What father allows his children to live in squalor when he lives in splendour? What father has a refrigerator full of food and denies his children food? Don't buy the stay in poverty hype from these so-called Christian churned out of white seminaries mercenaries sent to destroy your minds and bodies. And so my friends untill next time, live well, be happy, make love, we bid you Peace.
Vs 36 states that the 'Midianites' sold Joseph to Potiphar. Now here is where I seem to get baffled. Ishmael, was Abrahams first son, albeit not the chosen, as he was the son of Hagar the Egyptian. This also leads to the question as to why Isaac was called the only son, and why Abraham was willing to sacrifice Isaac, since he knew that Ishmael was his son also.
Midian, father to the Midianites, was one of Abrahams sons with Keturah after the passing/death of Sarah. So the question I am really asking is, just who did have and sold Joseph? Was it the Midianites or the Ishmeelites? Ishmeelites here I take it is a misspelling of Ishmael, father of the Ishmaelites.
Perhaps one of my learned brethren can clear my ignorance on this matter, as trivial as it may seem to some.
King David, said to be a man after the heart of The Most High, 1Samuel chapter 13 vs 14. Question? In chapter 17 in the first book of kings, called 1Samuel, starting in verse 34 we read,
"And David said unto Saul, thy servant kept his fathers sheep, and there came a lion, and a bear, and took a lamb out of the flock": Now to my knowledge of animals, bears and lions don't run together, something just does not sound right, and no one questions this because they are either too enarmored with the story of bravery, or are just willing to acccept little 'white lies'.
Vs 35-36 "And I went out after him and smote him, and delivered it out of his mouth: and when he arose against me, I caught him by his beard, and smote him, and slew him. Thy servant slew both the lion and the bear: and this uncircumcised Philistine shall be as one of them, seeing he hath defied the armies of the living God.
So again the question here is, was it one animal or two that he slayed at the same time? Because in verse 37 it is ascribed to David as saying, "David said moreover, The Lord that delivered me out of the paw of the lion, and out of the paw of the bear, he will deliver me out of the hand of this Philistine".
I have always been struck by this note, as to how he could have killed a bear and a lion over just one lamb, since no lion is about to share his prey with a bear, how could this be that he slew these two ferocious animals at once? Something here also does not sound right. Either he killed a lion, or he killed a bear, but this two-fer doesn't make it past me, if you accept that, that's on you, I'm just saying.
Now concerning poverty, wealth and other social issues. Many think or believe that for any one to believe or accept the Messiah, Yahawahshai Son of The Most High, that one ought to be dirt poor, living in abject poverty to be righteous.
Then there are the money hungry money changers parading as pastors, reverends and ministers all making disproportionate monies from allegedly preaching the word of 'God' to congregations bamboozled and hoodwinked into fear of a white Jesus placing them into eternal hell-fires.
While many of these preachers preach about the paying of tithes from the 'Old Testament', they are also quick to say that it's (the Old Testament) done away with and come with some Grecian ideas of pagan corruption of the laws given to Israel, and since the Messiah came and went, ergo the New Testament.
Is poverty a requirement to righteousness though? Deuteronomy 15 vs 11 "For the poor shall never cease out of the land: therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land".
This is a statement letting us know that there will always be poverty, not that it is a requirement for salvation or righteousness, and that we Israelites should practice love and kindness one toward another. The meaness of human nature and of us towards each other is one of the great faults that has brought us down from favor with Yah.
Another great bamboozling tool of so-called 'Christianity' and their self serving preachers is the use of 1Timothy chap 6 verses 9-10. "But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition". This is taken as an admonition to remain in poverty and not to seek gain in any form, which is contradictory to nature and life in any form, as life itself is about movement, both physically, spiritually, mentally and reflects in one's lifestyle or living, or the lack thereof.
Vs 10 "For the love* of money is the root of all evil: (*Note; it is the love* of, not the actual unfeeling money itself that's the root of evil, or should it not have said plain old greed?) which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows". Most folks jump on these two verses and just blindly think and accept poverty as the right way to be, and in most instances, this fits the so-called Negro to a Tee.
Indeed the scriptures do point out that greed is the very sin/ error of man that is leading down the path to self destruction. "He that loveth silver shall not be satisfied with silver; nor he that loveth abundance with increase: this is also vanity" Ecclesiastes 5 vs 10.[K.J.V.]. So, is it wrong to want abundance?
"The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly". John 10 vs 10. What therefore is this abundance that our Messiah is speaking of? Surely this abundance could not mean more poverty? "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan". Revelation chap 2 vs 9. [K.J.V.]
If even in our state of poverty we are rich, then to be rich is certainly not a crime, though many would have you to believe so. Of course there are levels to this, from the physical to the spiritual.
Money can not only be used for evil, it is also used for good, often times not recognized as such. "For wisdom is a defence, and money is a defence: but the excellency of knowledge is, that wisdom giveth life to them that have it" Ecclesiastes 7 vs 12. Here it states that money is a defence. You must have also heard the old saying that a fool and his money is soon parted.
As for those who justify the Care for a Dollar preachers and the T.D.Jake types this is what is said of them, who are supposed to feed the flock of Yah, "Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter". Isaiah chap 56: 11.
Of course this entire book of the Bible is indeed a mystery to many and many parts have not been revealed to some or to all. "And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, (indeed many facts were sealed and are just now being revealed by the Holy spirit through those Yah has appointed to bring many things to light), which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot for it is sealed":
Those stepinfetchit white theologians churned out to promote John 3:16 into the hearts and minds/homes of the Negro still cannot give any understanding of what indeed this book is putting forth for the true people of Yah. And so many of the prophesies both past , present and future remain sealed from their understanding.
"And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, [The average man on the street], saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned". Isaiah chap 30 vs 11-12. [K.J.V.].
The average man and woman on the streeet only go by what most of these lying preachers put forth to them as gospel truth without following the admonition given in the book of or should I say letter to Timothy, to "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth". And thus it seems why so many have left off using the brain that Yah gave them to question or to think as to what is written and to use their imagination as to the time period written and as to human nature in all that is written.
"The Lord shall command the blessing upon thee in thy storehouses, and in all that thou settest thine hand unto; and he shall bless thee in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee". The purpose of tithes was two fold back then. One it was to ensure that the levites would always have sufficient for their needs, and secondly to assist the poor of our nation as a collective.
"Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be meat in mine house, and prove me now herewith, saith the Lord of hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it". Malachi chap 3 vs 10.
That is the purpose of tithes, it is supposed to be a sort of savings fund to be used for the good of those of our brethren and sisters in dire need of assistance, not to fluff the pockets of these T.D.Jakes types, or Joel Osteen, Stanley, or any of the innumerable T.V. preachers around giving their spiels on the word of Yah.
Also there is nothing wrong with substance as can be seen by the example of our forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. All three men had great substance and were blessed in their possessions by Yah. "House and riches are the inheritance of fathers: and a prudent wife is from the Lord" Proverbs chap 19 vs 14.. As we see here there is nothing wrong with riches, although many presume that it's wrong to have.
Now we all know of the young man that was rich that did not want to be separate from his riches when he wanted to walk with the Messiah when he came to ancient Jerusalem. Many have since thought that it would be impossible to have and still be in good grace with Yah, ignoring the word of Yahawahshai that with Yah all things are possible.
Again here is the real deal, since Yah is My father is not this whole earth his? Psalms 50 vs 10-12, "For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine. If I were hungry I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof".
Since this planet belongs to my father Yah, where does it say that I should dwell in constant poverty, seeing that all belongs to abba Yah? What father allows his children to live in squalor when he lives in splendour? What father has a refrigerator full of food and denies his children food? Don't buy the stay in poverty hype from these so-called Christian churned out of white seminaries mercenaries sent to destroy your minds and bodies. And so my friends untill next time, live well, be happy, make love, we bid you Peace.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)